Is the Sun Conscious?
Rupert Sheldrake explores whether consciousness could extend to the Sun and other self-organizing systems, drawing on panpsychism, electromagnetic field theories, integrated information, solar activity, and speculative stellar agency. The paper proposes possibilities and observational questions; it does not report a detection of solar consciousness. Its discussion includes the computational and conceptual limits of integrated information theory.
Search extracted document text
Probed searches extracted/indexed text and can show matching pages when page indexing is available.
Document Intel
Source status, provenance, and extraction context.
- Source / agency
- Journal of Consciousness Studies
- Type
- Document
- Classification
- Unclassified
- Reference #
- —
- Published
- 2021
- Content Type
- application/pdf
- Pages
- 21
Structured Analysis
Claims and source material extracted from the document text. Timeline context is surfaced in document intel.
Sheldrake proposes that panpsychism and field theories permit consideration of a conscious Sun extending its activity through the solar system.
When applied to the sun, such field theories suggest a possible physical basis for the solar mind, both within the body of the sun itself and also throughout the solar system. If the sun is
Sheldrake describes panpsychism as attributing experience to fundamental constituents without requiring every arbitrary collection of matter to be a conscious subject.
Strawson and Goff both make it clear that they are not proposing that all physical objects are conscious or aware. Their arguments apply to self-organizing systems like atoms, cells, and
The paper describes integrated information theory as requiring integration, differentiated possible states, and a maximum relative to subsystems and larger systems.
IIT has a further requirement for consciousness called the ‘exclusion postulate’. A conscious system is a maximum of integrated informa- tion. It must have more integrated information than its own parts, and also than any
Sheldrake emphasizes that calculating integrated information for complex brains is computationally intractable with the methods he discusses.
However, the mathematics of IIT involves so many possible combi- nations of elements and subsystems that computing Φ for brains is impossible in practice, even with a new streamlined mathematical version of the theory
Sheldrake uses Whitehead’s philosophy of organism and nested wholes to frame consciousness at multiple scales.
In the light of the philosophy of organism, everywhere we look in nature, at every level and scale, we find wholes that are made up of parts, which are themselves wholes at a lower level:
The paper presents McFadden’s conscious electromagnetic information field hypothesis as one possible account of how brain activity and subjective experience relate.
Some go further and propose that brains’ electromagnetic fields actually are conscious. In his ‘conscious electromagnetic information field’ (Cemi) hypothesis, JohnJoe McFadden points out that brains both generate electromagnetic fields and are influenced
Sheldrake surveys Pockett’s electromagnetic and Murphy’s magnetic approaches as field-based alternatives for understanding consciousness.
Likewise, Susan Pockett, a neurophysiologist, argues that some three-dimensional electromagnetic field patterns in brains are con- scious: ‘conscious experiences may actually be transient spatial patterns of large field potentials: in
Sheldrake describes Matloff’s proposal that directional stellar jets could steer stars and gives predictions about jet frequency and orientation.
In his volitional star hypothesis, Matloff suggests that stars adjust their positions within galaxies by firing off electromagnetically powered jets more in one direction than another, steering themselves into their
The paper describes Vidal’s stellivore hypothesis as interpreting mass-accreting binary systems as potentially energy-seeking agents.
The philosopher Clément Vidal has proposed a very different view of volitional stars in his stellivore hypothesis. Vidal suggests that some stars may be predators that seek out victims, from which they suck out matter
Sheldrake identifies electrically charged plasma and mutually interacting magnetic fields as the physical basis for his solar analogy.
Thus magnetic fields control the movements of the plasma and the movements of the plasma control the fields (Green, 2016). In the layers
The paper discusses solar cycles, magnetic reversals, flares, and mass ejections as organized activity a solar-consciousness hypothesis would have to address.
The sun undergoes approximately 11-year cycles of activity. When its activity is greatest, there are many sunspots, from which extra- ordinarily strong magnetic fields emerge from the sun’s interior, loop around above
Sheldrake argues the Sun may qualitatively satisfy integrated-information criteria while acknowledging that its integrated-information value cannot presently be calculated.
However, actually to calculate the Φ value of the sun is not feasible at present. If current methods would take billions of years to compute Φ for
Sheldrake objects that integrated information theory’s exclusion rule would prevent simultaneous consciousness at nested solar and galactic scales.
The exclusion postulate is a winner-takes-all principle, whereby the highest level of integration is conscious while subsystems within it are not. The solar system is part of the Milky Way galaxy, and therefore if the galaxy became
Sheldrake speculates that a conscious Sun might select among patterns of sunspots, flares, mass ejections, and plasma flows.
Its choices may include an influence on the numbers, locations, and activities of sunspots, the timing and directions of solar flares and coronal mass ejections, and the coordination of granules and super- granules within the
The paper estimates slow light-speed limits for hypothetical solar perception and suggests possible regulation of the heliosphere and communication among stars.
Thus, by our standards, solar thoughts and perceptions would be slow. If the sun is conscious, if it has experiences, feelings, desires, memories, imaginings, and intentions, then what might it be con-
Sheldrake concludes that solar consciousness expands panpsychist inquiry beyond explanations limited to human brains.
The possibility that the sun is conscious expands the scope of our thinking. We can move beyond familiar debates about the ‘hard problem’, whose primary concern is to explain
Chronology extracted from the document text.
Is the Sun Conscious? published
Sheldrake’s essay appears in Journal of Consciousness Studies, volume 28, numbers 3–4, pages 8–28.
Zwicky examines galaxy-cluster motions
Sheldrake recounts Fritz Zwicky’s early inference that visible mass did not account for observed cluster dynamics.
Referenced In Coverage
Investigative posts, source items, and other coverage that currently cite this document.

Probed ingest of: The Most Controversial Biologist Alive Breaks Down Telepathy
American Alchemy host Jesse Michels interviews Rupert Sheldrake about telepathy, morphic resonance, perception, bioelectricity, precognition, artificial intelligence, and the possibility of a conscious Sun. The conversation moves from dog-return experiments and negative screen-watching results to proposed alarm and earthquake studies, plasma speculation, angels, and gratitude. The analysis distinguishes Michels’ connections from Sheldrake’s claims and compares key points with Turing’s paper, solar-consciousness research, Tufts, and USGS.