@GoodTroubleShow: "If the Syria UAP’s apparent acceleration is due to camera movement, there would be *no* diagonal..."

True. https://t.co/hC262F2K7n [Quoted] If the Syria UAP’s apparent acceleration is due to camera movement, there would be *no* diagonal background movement when the object accelerates. But there is (compare red arrow to background motion). The camera (background) motion only changes *AFTER* the object accelerates. https://t.co/9zK05jfUOl https://t.co/MGSilpmfzj

@GoodTroubleShow: "If the Syria UAP’s apparent… | Probed