Post
LIVE

How about a new rule: no more "there is no evidence"?

Repeating the claim that “there is no evidence for UAP” doesn’t advance science or skepticism, it stalls discussion. It forces every conversation to restart at step one; re-establishing basic facts that have already been documented for decades: multiple government investigations, multi-sensor military encounters, declassified files, and testimony from high-ranking trained observers all exist---which is exactly why this sub exists in the first place. Reasonable people can debate what these phe...