David Grusch stated that he sent more than twelve 1st hand (“worked on the program, touched craft”) witnesses to the Intelligence Community Inspector General, who then testified under oath. Source: Justice Watch (May 05, 2026) https://t.co/Wflb6vaL9S

David Grusch testified under oath that the U.S. government possesses craft and biological material of non-human origin. The IC Inspector General found his complaint credible and urgent. Ryan Graves testified that pilots fear reporting UAP sightings because of career consequences. Lue Elizondo testified under oath about secret crash retrieval programs funded by misallocated taxpayer dollars. These people didn't come forward anonymously. They used their names. They testified under oath. They ac...

David Grusch testified under oath that the U.S. government possesses craft and biological material of non-human origin. The IC Inspector General found his complaint credible and urgent. Ryan Graves testified that pilots fear reporting UAP sightings because of career consequences. Lue Elizondo testified under oath about secret crash retrieval programs funded by misallocated taxpayer dollars. These people didn't come forward anonymously. They used their names. They testified under oath. They ac...

RT @JamesWellsB2: Whistleblowing Fact 1327: The NSA inspector general found that the agency routinely omits required information about whis…

🚨What Do They Know? Why UAP Whistleblowers Are Appealing Directly to Trump Something has recently changed in the way people inside the UFO disclosure effort are speaking. For years, the familiar route was through congressional hearings, classified briefings, inspector general complaints and carefully worded interviews. Information moved behind closed doors while the public received fragments. Witnesses could tell certain people certain things, provided the conversation remained inside the cl...

14/ The seven surviving claims should be scrutinized as well. What general subjects did they concern? How many involved alleged retrieval programs, reverse engineering, biological material, security practices or unauthorized spending? Did AARO obtain documents or identify corroborating witnesses? Were any matters referred to Congress, an inspector general or another investigative body? None of that requires revealing the identities of the people involved, so where is the information?