Eric Davis, the Armed Forces Institute of Pathology, Ft. Detrick, and NHI bodies used for biological warfare

Listen, 1952 was a long time ago. If the next tranche includes audio or video of the Beacon Hill Group Briefing, that would be great. But its not images or footage of anomalous craft and NHI bodies with legitimate chains of custody. 😑 https://t.co/Aaxtr6XYHv https://t.co/lIP50TkYQ2

Dr. Eric Davis: “The evidence I saw came from the site of a foreign UFO crash retrieval with non human bodies.” 👽 The astrophysicist and former NIDS/AAWSAP consultant reviewed US collected intelligence reports on a foreign government’s recovery of a downed UAP craft. The reports confirmed NHI bodies were recovered with it. Davis was brought in as an outside scientist specifically because of his PhD level expertise and ability to separate ground truth from noise. The material adds an internat...

RT @ufouapam: This is a big one. Dr Eric Davis discusses recovered NHI bodies, original foreign crash-retrieval files, alleged government…

This is a big one. Dr Eric Davis discusses recovered NHI bodies, original foreign crash-retrieval files, alleged government contact with NHI and decades of failed reverse engineering. Premieres TODAY: 6pm UK | 1pm ET | 10am PT Watch and set a reminder: https://t.co/NYQZufStk2 https://t.co/gg99W3fWPy

UAP Astrophysicist Eric Davis, the 1860s Armed Forces Institute of Pathology, and Biological Warfare via recovered NHI bodies at Battelle Institute

UAP Astrophysicist Eric Davis, the 1860s Armed Forces Institute of Pathology, and Biological Warfare via recovered NHI bodies at Battelle Institute

UAP Astrophysicist Eric Davis, the 1860s Armed Forces Institute of Pathology, and Biological Warfare via recovered NHI bodies at Battelle Institute

We don't have a tissue sample? No shit. If this (NHI bodies) is real, do you really expect tissue samples to leak or be shared at this point? And IMO, this isn't from a distant world. My leading theory is...it's one intelligence pretending to be multiple, and it's from here. Read Keel's OTH. Could it be more than one thing? Of course. But as I've said before, just because people have reported four types of beings (the most), doesn't mean we're dealing with four types of beings. Could be one i...