Unknown
View original source
Active leadUseful case file with unresolved ambiguity and room for more corroboration.

The Sagrada Família Case - 1963 in Belo Horizonte, Brazil

UnknownNamed sourcesJun 8, 2026, 7:28 PMBelo Horizonte, Brazil

Witnesses

Unknown

Duration

Unknown

Source material

3

Timeline

2

Source context

Limited context

54

Interesting, but still missing stronger corroboration or harder source material.

Source provenance

r/UFOs

Live sighting record 7fe7ecb1-2bbb-4ac1-8f68-44da868649a8.

Using the selected case's real source, media, and context throughout the workspace.

Correlations

Field Intelligence

Sunlight window

Daytime — sun above horizon

Sighting occurred during daylight hours

Solar window

Sunrise6:27 AM
Sunset5:24 PM
Day length10h 58m

Weather

Open-Meteo
ConditionsClear sky
Temperature72°F
Cloud cover11% · Mostly clear
Wind3 mph

Area activity

Within 2 daysNo sightings within 60 mi

Extracted details

Observed facts

Occurred

Jun 8, 2026, 7:28 PM

Timezone

Brasilia Standard Time

Location

Belo Horizonte, Brazil

Witness account

Narrative

This case was investigated by Brazil's first ufological investigation group, CICOANI, founded in 1952 by the first Brazilian ufologist, Professor Húlvio Brant Aleixo. It is considered one of the most interesting cases in national ufology because even after more than 60 years since the event, the witnesses maintain their stories and have never contradicted themselves. The witness's testimony was registered by Professor Alberto Francisco do Carmo, who interviewed them after reading the account...

Case progression

Timeline

PublishedJun 8, 2026, 7:28 PM

r/UFOs carried the report into the source network.

Linked event

Grouped into the Sagrada Família Case incident dossier.

Ledger

Source material

media

Cover image

Open

Visual reference carried with the original report.

source

Original report

Open

Direct source material from r/UFOs.

telemetry

Environmental pass

Historical atmosphere, astronomy, and nearby infrastructure were resolved for this case.