ReportAnalyzed

Information and Uncertainty in Remote Perception Research

Brenda Dunne and Robert Jahn review PEAR’s 1976–1999 remote-perception program: 653 formal trials and multiple scoring systems produced a positive aggregate statistic, but later FIDO results weakened and 150 distributive-protocol trials were indistinguishable from chance. The authors interpret the decline as a possible tension between analytical structure and subjective response.

Princeton Engineering Anomalies Research Laboratory2003-01-01
IngestcompleteAnalysiscomplete

Search extracted document text

Probed searches extracted/indexed text and can show matching pages when page indexing is available.

Extracted text indexedPage numbers appear after page indexing completes for this external source.
Search the extracted document text plus structured claims, source material, and timeline entries. Probed returns snippets only; the original document remains on the external source.
Pages
35
Claims
16
Backlinks
1
Signals
0

Document Intel

Source status, provenance, and extraction context.

Source / agency
Princeton Engineering Anomalies Research Laboratory
Type
Report
Classification
Reference #
Published
2003-01-01
Content Type
application/pdf
Pages
35

Structured Analysis

Claims and source material extracted from the document text. Timeline context is surfaced in document intel.

AI deep ingest from Princeton Engineering Anomalies Research Laboratory.
Claims
Reported by source12Source interpretation4
Source reportedUnverified

The paper says PEAR’s formal database comprised 653 trials evaluated with 24 scoring recipes and reports an aggregate z-score of 5.418 against chance.

The formal database comprises 653 experimental trials performed over several phases of investigation. The scoring methods involve various arrays of descriptor queries

Source reportedUnverified

The authors report that aggregate results were not significantly changed by target distance, timing, descriptor effectiveness, tested protocol parameters, or participant-response biases.

these overall results are not significantly affected by any of the secondary protocol parameters tested, or by variations in descriptor effectiveness, possible participant response biases, target distance from the percipient, or time interval

Source reportedObserved

PEAR’s remote-perception database included 653 formal and 126 non-formal trials conducted between 1976 and 1999.

One of the largest extant databases, comprising 653 formal and 126 non-formal experimental trials, was produced between 1976 and 1999

Source reportedObserved

The PEAR protocol required target selection from sealed, randomly numbered envelopes or a volitional target choice, with percipients recording free-response impressions without an experimenter present.

The contents of this pool are stored in separate sealed envelopes, randomly numbered, and maintained so that no agent or percipient has access to them.

Source reportedAsserted

The paper says strict precautions required perceptions to be recorded before participants had sensory access to target information and barred ordinary communication between percipient and agent until afterward.

strict precautions are taken to ensure that perceptions are recorded and filed before percipients have any sensory access to information about the targets

Source reportedUnverified

As of 1983, PEAR reported 227 formal binary-scored trials with composite z-scores above 6 across five corrected scoring methods.

The original version of this table, published in Technical Report 83003, contained an error that inadvertently inflated the results from Method A

Source reportedObserved

By 1988, the binary-descriptor database contained 411 trials from 48 participants, including 336 formal trials.

By 1988 the total PEAR PRP binary-descriptor database consisted of 411 trials, produced by a total of 48 participants. Of these, 336 trials qualified as formal

Source reportedUnverified

The 336 formal binary trials were reported at a composite z-score of 6.355, with stronger average effects for instructed targets than volitional targets.

Formal trials 336 .5447 .347 6 .152 1.083 6.355

Source reportedUnverified

The paper says the data did not show attenuation with greater target distance or temporal separation, which the authors describe as difficult to reconcile with known physical processes.

The lack of evidence for attenuation of the remote perception yield with increased distance or time severely limits the possibilities for theoretical explication in terms of any known physical process.

Source reportedObserved

The FIDO phase ran for four years beginning in 1985 and produced 167 trials using 32 revised descriptors.

The FIDO program ran for four years, beginning in 1985, and produced a total of 167 trials.

Source reportedUnverified

The standard FIDO analysis produced a marginal composite z-score of 1.735, and alternative scoring methods did not restore the stronger earlier yield.

The composite z-score thus calculated for the 167 FIDO trials was 1.735, indicating a marginally significant overall achievement, but one that was reduced even further from the high yield of the previous data.

Source reportedAsserted

Thirty distributive-protocol series totaling 150 trials were reported as completely indistinguishable from chance across six scoring recipes.

Thirty experimental series comprising 150 trials were generated using this distributive protocol by 12 participant pairs

InterpretationAsserted

The authors conclude that progressively elaborate analysis did not enhance the effect and describe the 150 distributive trials as null.

It was evident from the null results of the 150 distributive trials that all efforts to enhance the effect by progressively more elaborate analysis techniques not only had failed, but even had proven counter-productive.

InterpretationUnverified

The paper’s aggregate statistic was driven primarily by stronger earlier trials, while later ab initio, FIDO, and distributive subsets weakened sharply.

While the composite yield of the total database remains highly significant, it is evident that this result is driven primarily by the much stronger yields of the earlier trials

InterpretationUnverified

The authors hypothesize that increasingly detailed descriptor formats may have constrained free-response imagery and suppressed the reported anomaly.

each increment of analytical refinement appears to have resulted in a systematic reduction not of the noise but of the signal itself

InterpretationAsserted

The authors also note that early exploratory trials without the agent’s identity or target-visit time were completely null, implying that their uncertainty hypothesis still required minimal task boundaries.

the early exploratory trials, where percipients did not know the identity of the agent or the time of target visitation, produced completely null results

Timeline

Chronology extracted from the document text.

2003

Information and Uncertainty published

The Journal of Scientific Exploration published Dunne and Jahn’s review in volume 17, number 2.

1999

PEAR remote-perception database period ended

The paper identifies 1999 as the end of the 1976–1999 experimental database period.

1985

FIDO scoring phase began

PEAR began the four-year FIDO phase using a revised set of 32 descriptors.

1976

PEAR remote-perception database period began

The paper says the formal and non-formal trial database was produced from 1976 through 1999.

Source material
Information and Uncertainty in Remote Perception Research
paperPrimary
Brenda J. Dunne and Robert G. Jahn, Journal of Scientific Exploration, vol. 17, no. 2, 2003, pp. 207–241Page 207Page 208Page 209Page 210Page 211Page 212Page 213Page 214Source link

Referenced In Coverage

Investigative posts, source items, and other coverage that currently cite this document.

American Alchemy
Aug 13independent

Probed ingest of: UFOs, Psychics and The Afterlife with PhD Jeffrey Mishlove

Jesse Michels interviews parapsychologist Jeffrey Mishlove about Ted Owens’ alleged psychokinesis and UFO forecasts, the SRI and PEAR research legacy, Robert Bigelow’s survival-of-consciousness essay competition, and Mishlove’s path from criminology to New Thinking Allowed. The episode also explores remote viewing, mediumship, Annika and Tristan, alleged psionic programs, plasma-consciousness theories, and the evidence gaps separating documented research history from extraordinary claims.