This is absolutely on point. https://t.co/2tJ9VDBdhE [Quoted] @emmatuckerWSJ: This is not complicated. Mellon alleges a scientist’s words were used to support a conclusion about material he wasn’t discussing, and that correction requests went unanswered. @joel_schectman can explain the reporting. You can explain the editorial decision to stand by it. @WSJPR: publish the answer. It is 2026. UAP transparency commands bipartisan attention in Congress and scrutiny from former military and intelli...