BAASS’s November 2009 report combines MUFON field cases, Utah Ranch patrols and interviews, proposed experiments and a preliminary blue-orb medical investigation. It includes a model-glider identification, normal radiation checks and explicit criticisms of uncontrolled coin-movement reports. The medical annex is heavily redacted, and the report does not establish a causal link between the claimed encounter and illness.
Utah Ranch
LocationUtah Ranch
LocationThe seventh tranche of U.S. government UFO records has been released today, October 23. Among the material now available: • A 2026 encounter in which federal agents reported a silent black triangle rising above a ridge before descending into a canyon. The files include visual and thermal observations, alongside differing accounts of the timing and duration. • A 60-page investigation by Bigelow Aerospace Advanced Space Studies documenting its 2010 Utah ranch fieldwork, including witness interv...

"...the creature is standing on two legs, the estimated height is six to seven feet." 🫣 Drop 7 - Creatures 🐺 "Interspersed with the allegations of multiple creature sightings are multiple reports of unidentified flying objects." "Eleven (11) separate individuals witnessed a bipedal 'dog-like' creature and/or orbs of light at different times in different locations near the Utah Ranch property." (NEAR, not ON Skinwalker - I'm reading the interviews of the witnesses now. An old-lady-like creat...

BAASS’s March–April 2010 Utah Ranch investigation combines local witness interviews, camera deployment, radio-frequency measurements and plant experiments. An attached laboratory report identifies the tested hairs as raccoon and domestic dog; the fence samples do not establish an unknown creature. The report also qualifies its sighting-map extrapolations and says the plant experiments were too early for conclusions.
BAASS’s November 2010 capabilities report describes its DIA-funded personnel, sensors, Project Capella databases and engineering software. It revisits the 2004 Nimitz encounter and demonstrates fluid-flow, underwater-acoustic and radar-cross-section models. The calculations depend on assumed conditions and limited testimony; they do not measure an unknown vehicle’s propulsion or establish the report’s speculative cloaking and undersea interpretations.


