The documentary Moment of Contact presents Dr. Italo Venturelli as its most explosive witness, but the chronology of what he says raises some questions. Let’s take a look at them. The main investigators of the case were Dr. Ubirajara Rodrigues, who uncovered the case, and Vitorio Pacaccini. Dr. Ubirajara Rodrigues is now a skeptic and no longer believes in the case. However, he wrote several books, as did Pacaccini, which gives us a documented chronology of the events surrounding the case. Dr...

RT @InterstellarUAP: Dr. Italo Venturelli: “I saw the being. It was not a being from our planet.” 👽 🇧🇷 In January 1996, three young women…

Dr. Italo Venturelli: “I saw the being. It was not a being from our planet.” 👽 🇧🇷 In January 1996, three young women in Varginha, Brazil, reported a hunched figure with large red eyes, oily skin and three bumps on its head crouched against a wall. They ran home terrified. Days earlier, ultralight pilot Carlos de Sousa said he watched a cylindrical craft trail smoke and hit the ground. Locals then described military trucks, fire crews and armed men moving through the city. Venturelli, a neu...

James Fox on the Varginha case: "The lead neurosurgeon examined a non-human being in captivity" — LIVE interview today Documentary filmmaker James Fox joins Matt Ford on The Good Trouble Show LIVE today (Sunday, March 22 at 1:00 PM PT) for a deep dive into his expanded documentary Moment of Contact: New Revelations of Alien Encounters. What the interview covers: - The first-ever on-camera testimony from Dr. Italo Venturelli, a physician at Regional Hospital in Varginha, who describes a four-m...

A neurosurgeon in Varginha, Brazil kept a secret for 29 years. In 1996, Dr. Italo Venturelli examined a captured non-human being at the regional hospital. Four minutes. Bedside. He described telepathic communication — and nearly died of a heart attack rather than go public. https://t.co/tW2Ucji8nz

Please go easy on me… As a lurker more than a poster, I feel like I’m going to get mauled for this. First of all, ‘self-promoting’ a shitty AI youtube video is the only way I could try and put my questions together with facts. I know not many people have over an hour of their time to waste, so I will just ask the questions and include timestamps to show the sources/contradictions. I’d really appreciate other people views on these. My aim is not to discredit anyone, maybe it’s just me that’s m...