What counts as an official UFO document
This collection focuses on records published by government sources or transferred into official archives. It includes reports, correspondence, memoranda, historical case files, information papers, and other documentary material associated with UFO or UAP research and reporting. A document’s presence records official provenance; it does not automatically validate every statement inside it.
Probed keeps a canonical file page for each eligible PURSUE asset and links back to the government source. Page-level claims and excerpts appear only when a completed extraction preserves a usable source locator. Researchers should verify quoted language against the original PDF, including nearby qualifications, redactions, and attachments.
Defense releases and archival transfers
PURSUE and AARO are active publication systems, while the National Archives is building the statutory UAP Records Collection in Record Group 615. These surfaces overlap in subject but serve different functions. A file can appear in a current release, an agency reading room, an archival transfer, or more than one of those places.
NARA bulk downloads are especially useful for reproducible archival work because they pair digital objects with metadata exports. Probed links to the most specific official source available and avoids creating duplicate search pages for the same official-release asset.
How to cite and compare records
Cite the issuing or holding agency, official title, identifier, date, page number, release or record group, source URL, and access date. When a scan has handwritten page numbers and a PDF viewer has different digital page numbers, record both. For correspondence, distinguish the author and recipient from the agency that later released the file.
Compare documents using identifiers and source context before relying on text similarity. OCR can misread stamps, tables, handwriting, or degraded scans. Probed search text and summaries are discovery aids; the official image or PDF remains the reference copy.
Curated records
Explore the source files
Tremonton Film: Conflicting Technical Assessments
This Project Blue Book file preserves Delbert C. Newhouse’s account and film submission from the 2 July 1952 Tremonton incident. Newhouse said the sky supplied no fixed reference for estimating distance, size, altitude, or speed. Navy analysts favored an unidentified light-source interpretation under disputed assumptions, while later reviews considered balloons, birds, insects, and mirage; one 1956 study remained inconclusive before an Air Force memo adopted a seabird explanation.
AAWSAP’s 2008 research objectives and requirements
DIA’s July 2008 AAWSAP objectives call for studies of breakthrough aerospace technologies and their implications for foreign threats through 2050. The four-page statement specifies research fields, expert qualifications, security requirements and a sequence of reports; it describes commissioned work, without establishing that the proposed technologies had been achieved.
AAWSAP contract award, schedules and data rights
This 59-page AAWSAP contract identifies BAASS, the September 2008 award, scheduled reports and government data rights. The released copy also includes a $21.95 million total and performance dates extending into December 2010, so it should be read with the later modifications rather than as an untouched record of the original award. Most pages contain standard procurement terms.
Metallic Glasses for Aerospace
This reference evaluates metallic glasses as possible aerospace structural materials. It highlights high strength and thermoplastic processing alongside low ductility, fatigue concerns, and the lack of lightweight glass-forming alloys.
Metallic Spintronics
This reference reviews metallic spintronics, including giant magnetoresistance, magnetic multilayers, spin-transfer torque, and memory concepts. It describes experiments and device challenges in a developing condensed-matter field rather than an extraordinary sensing or propulsion capability.
Ruppelt’s 1952 briefing: unresolved reports and better measurements
This official transcript preserves a March 1952 presentation attributed to Captain Edward J. Ruppelt on the Air Force handling of unidentified-object reports. It records proposed data-collection methods, reported cases and alternatives, and repeated cautions that the available evidence did not establish the nature or origin of the reported phenomena.
Tremonton Photo File: Limits and Alternatives
This short Project Blue Book photo file records the 2 July 1952 Tremonton observation associated with CPO Delbert C. Newhouse. It says the photographed objects were too small and lacked reference points for estimating size, distance, or speed, and it lists pillow balloons or birds as possible explanations rather than a settled identification.
Delbert Newhouse’s Navy career and photographic service
Delbert Newhouse’s Navy personnel file documents a career in photography through assignments, qualifications, evaluations and retirement orders. It includes both favorable and critical performance appraisals and material dated later than the catalogue’s 1957 label. These records establish professional background; they do not independently identify the objects in his Tremonton film.
Air Force UFO correspondence, film inquiries and physical evidence
This Air Force correspondence file follows film-analysis requests, witness statements, interservice coordination and physical-evidence inquiries during 1952. It includes Newhouse’s explicit limits on estimating the Tremonton objects, the effort to recover a misplaced Mariana film copy, and FBI examination of a reportedly burned cap. Questions and proposed explanations remain distinct from established identifications.
DOW-UAP-D106, Mission Report, Iraq, 2022
This May 2022 mission report records an FMV observation that the reporting unit described as UAP activity during an Operation Inherent Resolve mission. It reports estimated speed and size while stating altitude could not be determined, so the record does not identify an object or establish its performance.
DOW-UAP-D107, Mission Report, Middle East, 2025
This October 2025 mission report records a UAP incident during an Operation Inherent Resolve mission. It preserves the observer’s description and reported speed, but the form leaves velocity and trajectory fields blank or estimated and does not establish identity or a measured performance.
DOW-UAP-D108, Mission Report, Middle East, 2025
This July 2025 mission report records a UAP incident during an Operation Inherent Resolve mission. The form preserves descriptions and an estimated velocity while also recording unknown control and propulsion, no material recovery, and no asserted advanced capabilities.
DOW-UAP-D109, Mission Report, Middle East, 2022
This May 2022 mission report records an FMV observation described by the reporting unit as UAP activity during an Operation Inherent Resolve mission. It reports estimated speed and size, says altitude could not be determined, and notes that dust storms affected some collection.
AAWSAP P00001: a funding-dependent option year
Modification P00001 extends the current AAWSAP contract period and revises the first option year to October 2009–September 2010. Its final page explicitly makes that option subject to available funding, while the cover form records no new obligation. The differing dates printed in the accompanying schedule should be read alongside the amendment’s specific revision.
AAWSAP P00002: option-year funding and revised deliverables
P00002 adds $11,948,810 for AAWSAP’s first option year and states a cumulative obligation of $21,948,810. The February 2010 modification removes the earlier funding-availability condition and calls for revised deliverables and documentation of risks from reduced funding. Its schedules allocate the option-year money among reports, management, assessment, travel and other costs.
AAWSAP P00003: representative change and authority limits
P00003 changes the contracting officer’s representative for the AAWSAP contract on May 18, 2010; the released copy withholds the appointee’s identity. The amendment limits the representative’s guidance to existing work and bars changes to scope, schedule, quantities or total value. It records a zero-dollar administrative modification.
Primary sources
- 01Presidential Unsealing and Reporting System for UAP Encounters — U.S. Department of War
- 02UAP report documents — All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office
- 03Congressional reports and briefings — All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office
- 04Record Group 615: UAP Records Collection — National Archives
- 05Federal agency guidance for the UAP Records Collection — National Archives
- 06Bulk downloads for UAP records — National Archives
- 072024 Consolidated Annual Report on UAP — Office of the Director of National Intelligence