How-to guide

How to View the Released UFO Files

A practical guide to finding, viewing, downloading, citing, and evaluating official UFO and UAP documents, images, audio, and video.

By Probed Editorial DeskReviewed by Probed Research ReviewUpdated September 1, 2026

Start with the official release record

Begin at the government page that published the material. For current PURSUE releases, the Department of War portal is the release authority. For AARO case videos or reports, use the AARO record page. For archival transfers, use the National Archives Catalog or Record Group 615 index. The hosting page establishes provenance, release date, agency attribution, and any explanatory text that may be lost when a file is reposted elsewhere.

Probed mirrors the research structure around those sources, not the authority of the sources themselves. Open a Probed file page to see the official identifier, media type, release context, incident metadata, direct source links, and any source-located findings. Then use the official link to verify the underlying document or media. If a social post or secondary article lacks an official identifier, search the distinctive title or file code in the tracker before relying on it.

View and download without losing context

Documents may open in an embedded viewer or download directly as PDFs. Video and audio can be hosted on an agency media system, a direct file endpoint, or a government video platform. Save the landing-page URL along with the direct media URL because direct files can move while the release record remains the best citation. When a release offers a large archive, use its individual records first to understand naming and folder structure before downloading gigabytes of material.

For reproducible research, record the access date, publisher, release number, official identifier, file name, and page or timecode. Preserve the original file rather than a recompressed social copy. If the agency supplies a checksum or metadata export, keep it beside the media. Probed findings link to exact pages or timecodes when those locators exist, but researchers should still verify the cited passage in the official file.

  • PDF: cite the document identifier and page number printed in the file or shown by the viewer.
  • Video or audio: cite the official identifier and a start–end timecode.
  • Image: retain the original file name and the release page that describes it.
  • Dataset or archive: preserve the release date, version, file list, and any included metadata manifest.

Verify what a file actually says

Read headings, stamps, distribution markings, dates, signatures, and attachment references before extracting a claim. A government file can document that a statement was received without endorsing the statement. Likewise, “unresolved” can mean the available data was insufficient for attribution; it is not automatically a finding of extraordinary technology. Note whether the language belongs to a witness, investigator, later analyst, or release-page editor.

Cross-check related material by official identifier, incident date, location, and agency. A document and video may describe the same occurrence while using different titles. Conversely, similar descriptive titles can refer to unrelated cases. Probed exposes these fields separately and connects records only when the production data supports the relationship.

When a file is missing, redacted, or unavailable

A missing attachment is not evidence that it was necessarily withheld for a particular reason. It may not have been digitized, transferred, linked correctly, or included in that release. Check the agency’s reading room, AARO records, the NARA collection, and bulk-download indexes. NARA guidance recognizes records released in full, released in part, or withheld in full, and its catalog descriptions may exist even when a digital object is unavailable online.

If the record still cannot be found, use FOIA.gov to identify the correct agency component. Describe existing records rather than asking the agency to answer a question. Include known offices, custodians, date ranges, identifiers, subject terms, and preferred electronic format. Keep the request focused and save the tracking number, correspondence, and final response with the research record.

Curated records

Explore the source files

documentRelease 06

Tremonton Film: Conflicting Technical Assessments

This Project Blue Book file preserves Delbert C. Newhouse’s account and film submission from the 2 July 1952 Tremonton incident. Newhouse said the sky supplied no fixed reference for estimating distance, size, altitude, or speed. Navy analysts favored an unidentified light-source interpretation under disputed assumptions, while later reviews considered balloons, birds, insects, and mirage; one 1956 study remained inconclusive before an Air Force memo adopted a seabird explanation.

documentRelease 06

AAWSAP’s 2008 research objectives and requirements

DIA’s July 2008 AAWSAP objectives call for studies of breakthrough aerospace technologies and their implications for foreign threats through 2050. The four-page statement specifies research fields, expert qualifications, security requirements and a sequence of reports; it describes commissioned work, without establishing that the proposed technologies had been achieved.

documentRelease 06

AAWSAP contract award, schedules and data rights

This 59-page AAWSAP contract identifies BAASS, the September 2008 award, scheduled reports and government data rights. The released copy also includes a $21.95 million total and performance dates extending into December 2010, so it should be read with the later modifications rather than as an untouched record of the original award. Most pages contain standard procurement terms.

documentRelease 06

Metallic Glasses for Aerospace

This reference evaluates metallic glasses as possible aerospace structural materials. It highlights high strength and thermoplastic processing alongside low ductility, fatigue concerns, and the lack of lightweight glass-forming alloys.

documentRelease 06

Metallic Spintronics

This reference reviews metallic spintronics, including giant magnetoresistance, magnetic multilayers, spin-transfer torque, and memory concepts. It describes experiments and device challenges in a developing condensed-matter field rather than an extraordinary sensing or propulsion capability.

documentRelease 06

Ruppelt’s 1952 briefing: unresolved reports and better measurements

This official transcript preserves a March 1952 presentation attributed to Captain Edward J. Ruppelt on the Air Force handling of unidentified-object reports. It records proposed data-collection methods, reported cases and alternatives, and repeated cautions that the available evidence did not establish the nature or origin of the reported phenomena.

videoRelease 06

DOW-UAP-PR159, Historical Film of Reported UFOs, Utah, 1952

This digitized 16 mm print shows low-detail bright marks against the sky from the 1952 Tremonton film. The official description says missing fixed reference points prevented a conclusive identification. At 00:55 the release changes to unrelated sewing-equipment footage; the record does not explain when or how the material was combined, and the reviewed imagery does not identify the airborne marks.

audioRelease 06

DOW-UAP-PR160, Presentation by Captain Edward J. Ruppelt, 1952

This 65-minute DVIDS recording preserves a March 1952 presentation associated with Captain Edward J. Ruppelt and the Air Force’s reorganized UFO investigation. Its official D154 companion transcript is indexed here in 19 sequential page-level spans with approximate audio locators. The presentation discusses unresolved reports and proposed data collection while stating that the Air Force had no conclusive evidence about the phenomena’s nature or origin.

videoRelease 06

LLE-UAP-PR001, Unresolved UAP Report, Colorado, 2023

A Colorado law-enforcement officer submitted this 79-second cellular-camera video from October 2023 and described a silent light flashing red, blue, and green. The official timeline says the camera pans and changes magnification while keeping an apparent light source near center; the lower frame was blurred for privacy. AARO warns that autofocus and image processing can distort distant subjects, and the reviewed footage does not identify the light.

videoRelease 06

LLE-UAP-PR002, Unresolved UAP Report, Colorado, October 2023

A Colorado law-enforcement officer submitted this 15-minute cellular-camera video from October 2023 and described a silent light flashing red, blue, and green. The official timeline says the camera keeps an apparent light source generally centered for the full clip, while the lower frame is blurred for privacy. AARO warns that phone autofocus and image processing can alter apparent shape and motion; the footage does not establish the light’s identity.

documentRelease 06

Tremonton Photo File: Limits and Alternatives

This short Project Blue Book photo file records the 2 July 1952 Tremonton observation associated with CPO Delbert C. Newhouse. It says the photographed objects were too small and lacked reference points for estimating size, distance, or speed, and it lists pillow balloons or birds as possible explanations rather than a settled identification.

documentRelease 06

Delbert Newhouse’s Navy career and photographic service

Delbert Newhouse’s Navy personnel file documents a career in photography through assignments, qualifications, evaluations and retirement orders. It includes both favorable and critical performance appraisals and material dated later than the catalogue’s 1957 label. These records establish professional background; they do not independently identify the objects in his Tremonton film.

documentRelease 06

Air Force UFO correspondence, film inquiries and physical evidence

This Air Force correspondence file follows film-analysis requests, witness statements, interservice coordination and physical-evidence inquiries during 1952. It includes Newhouse’s explicit limits on estimating the Tremonton objects, the effort to recover a misplaced Mariana film copy, and FBI examination of a reportedly burned cap. Questions and proposed explanations remain distinct from established identifications.

documentRelease 06

DOW-UAP-D106, Mission Report, Iraq, 2022

This May 2022 mission report records an FMV observation that the reporting unit described as UAP activity during an Operation Inherent Resolve mission. It reports estimated speed and size while stating altitude could not be determined, so the record does not identify an object or establish its performance.

documentRelease 06

DOW-UAP-D107, Mission Report, Middle East, 2025

This October 2025 mission report records a UAP incident during an Operation Inherent Resolve mission. It preserves the observer’s description and reported speed, but the form leaves velocity and trajectory fields blank or estimated and does not establish identity or a measured performance.

documentRelease 06

DOW-UAP-D108, Mission Report, Middle East, 2025

This July 2025 mission report records a UAP incident during an Operation Inherent Resolve mission. The form preserves descriptions and an estimated velocity while also recording unknown control and propulsion, no material recovery, and no asserted advanced capabilities.

Primary sources

  1. 01Presidential Unsealing and Reporting System for UAP Encounters — U.S. Department of War
  2. 02Official UAP imagery — All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office
  3. 03UAP report documents — All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office
  4. 04Record Group 615: UAP Records Collection — National Archives
  5. 05Federal agency guidance for the UAP Records Collection — National Archives
  6. 06Bulk downloads for UAP records — National Archives
  7. 07How to make a FOIA request — U.S. Department of Justice
  8. 08UAP Independent Study and final report — NASA