Steve Bruehl
PersonSteve Bruehl
PersonWhat a great visit! So lovely to have Steve Bruehl and his family here. We talked about our machine-learning paper, transients, UFOs, and nukes. https://t.co/EM14QExEyc

Meet my friend and colleague Steve Bruehl. Here we converse about transients. https://t.co/sOeib6yeeL

My friend and collaborator Dr. Steve Bruehl is presenting on our transient work at the Scientific Coalition for UAP Studies meeting in Toronto in July. Registration is open (in person or virtual): https://t.co/oEJugFGH7U https://t.co/C2TckbPNec

RT @DrBeaVillarroel: Glad to share a freshly submitted paper (now under peer review) from the VASCO team, led by Prof. Steve Bruehl. We use…

The new paper is led by Prof. Steve Bruehl with @DrBeaVillarroel and the VASCO team. Huge respect for this careful, rigorous work.
🚨Arresting new VASCO finding!! Using machine learning on 107,875 historical plate events, the data showed even stronger correlations with 𝐧𝐮𝐜𝐥𝐞𝐚𝐫 𝐭𝐞𝐬𝐭 𝐬𝐢𝐭𝐞𝐬. That is not what random noise is supposed to do. #ScientificDisclosure https://t.co/0mJXexRIRC [Quoted] Glad to share a freshly submitted paper (now under peer review) from the VASCO team, led by Prof. Steve Bruehl. We use machine learning to separate likely real transients from plate defects in a sample of 107,875 event...

RT @DrBeaVillarroel: Glad to share a freshly submitted paper (now under peer review) from the VASCO team, led by Prof. Steve Bruehl. We use…

RT @DrBeaVillarroel: Glad to share a freshly submitted paper (now under peer review) from the VASCO team, led by Prof. Steve Bruehl. We use…

RT @DrBeaVillarroel: Glad to share a freshly submitted paper (now under peer review) from the VASCO team, led by Prof. Steve Bruehl. We use…

Glad to share a freshly submitted paper (now under peer review) from the VASCO team, led by Prof. Steve Bruehl. We use machine learning to separate likely real transients from plate defects in a sample of 107,875 events. If correlations were spurious, they should weaken as artifacts are removed. Well...they don’t. Instead, the correlations strengthen as the sample gets cleaner. We see: (1) Stronger Earth shadow deficit (2) Stronger nuclear-test correlation (3) Highest in the highest-probabili...










