Air Force records trace the 1966 review of Project Blue Book, the decision to seek an independent scientific study, and appended Robertson Panel findings on weak case data, misidentification, radar interference, and public-education concerns. The collection connects multiple stages of federal UFO review and shows how methodological weakness, institutional credibility, and air-defense reporting concerns shaped policy as much as individual cases did.
National Academy of Sciences
OrgNational Academy of Sciences
Org1
Mentions (30d)
0
Active Signals
1
Sources
7
Co-mentions
30-Day Activity1 mentions
Sep 14Oct 13
Source material mix
Named sources1
2 entries
Filters
Time Range
In this episode of "Reality Check," Ross Coulthart sits down with Dr. Jacques Vallée, the astrophysicist, computer scientist and venture capitalist whose seven-volume "Forbidden Science" diaries have shaped UAP research for six decades. They discuss the final volume, "Forbidden Science 7." Vallée describes the data warehouse of some 260,000 sightings he built for the Bigelow Aerospace project funded by the Defense Intelligence Agency, why the work was cut off after roughly three years before...

govJul 10, 2026
DOW-UAP-D092, Department of the Air Force Committee to Review Project Bluebook, 1966-1967Department of War85 pagesJul 10, 2026RELEASE-04-FILE-017-DOW-UAP-D092-DEPARTMENT-OF-THE-AIR-FORCE-COMMITTEE-TO-REVIEW-PROJECT-BLUEBOOK-1966-1967
Mention Velocity
30d agoToday
Source Mix
r/UFOB1
RELATED ENTITIES(7)
Frequently mentioned alongside this entity
Related Signals
0
