Disclosure Foundation
OrgNonprofitDisclosure Foundation
OrgNonprofitThe Disclosure Foundation is a nonprofit advancing UAP transparency through policy work, legal support, research, public education, and whistleblower assistance.
The Disclosure Foundation is a nonprofit advancing UAP transparency through policy work, legal support, research, public education, and whistleblower assistance.
The Disclosure Foundation is a United States nonprofit organization focused on government transparency and public policy concerning unidentified anomalous phenomena. It developed from the UAP Disclosure Fund and broadened its work into research, legal advocacy, education, and support for witnesses and whistleblowers. Its leadership and advisers include figures with experience in national security, science, law, communications, and the modern disclosure movement.
The foundation publishes policy briefs, public-opinion research, preparedness studies, legal analysis, and recommendations for Congress and the executive branch. It also convenes public events and engages with media and lawmakers. These activities place it within civil society rather than government: it can propose standards, finance work, and advocate for action, but it cannot declassify a record, compel testimony, or make an official intelligence finding.
Its program centers on UAP transparency, whistleblower protection, improved evidence handling, and preparation for the social consequences of possible disclosure. The organization has supported work involving researchers and professionals such as Jennice Vilhauer and Mike Gold. Some publications proceed from the premise that a consequential disclosure may occur; that scenario-planning assumption should be separated from proof that non-human technology or intelligence has been established.
The Disclosure Foundation’s institutional significance lies in converting a loosely defined movement into concrete policy, legal, and research proposals. Its work can be evaluated through published methods, funding transparency, named authors, and measurable legislative or public outcomes. Because advocacy shapes which questions receive attention, the foundation is most credible when it marks its assumptions, distinguishes verified government activity from allegations, and exposes its recommendations to criticism from both proponents and skeptics. Its legal and psychological-preparedness programs also broaden the movement beyond demands for documents, creating outputs that can be assessed even before disputed claims are resolved.
[Retweeted] UAP Disclosure Must Be Enshrined in Law In a new Liberation Times (@LiberationTimes) opinion piece, Kevin Wright (@KWrightResearch) argues that the current UAP disclosure effort faces a critical test as Congress finalizes the FY2027 National Defense Authorization Act. The release of more than 155,000 pages through PURSUE represents meaningful progress. But executive action alone cannot guarantee lasting transparency. The Disclosure Foundation has consistently advocated for stronge...

[Retweeted] UAP Disclosure Must Be Enshrined in Law In a new Liberation Times (@LiberationTimes) opinion piece, Kevin Wright (@KWrightResearch) argues that the current UAP disclosure effort faces a critical test as Congress finalizes the FY2027 National Defense Authorization Act. The release of more than 155,000 pages through PURSUE represents meaningful progress. But executive action alone cannot guarantee lasting transparency. The Disclosure Foundation has consistently advocated for stronge...

[Retweeted] In this second clip from the recent Beyond Institute Stockholm UAP conference, Disclosure Foundation Executive Director Jordan Flowers (@jordanflowers) examines the geopolitical Risks of UAP Secrecy. Flowers: "There is a sub rosa arms race for winner-take-all technology... Maybe a breakthrough has rattled this perfect equilibrium of secrecy and that's why we need to take risks in terms of disclosing this to the public so that we can work together... to collaborate and solve the pr...
[Retweeted] Whistleblower Jake Barber has been hired by Rep. Eric Burlison to assist with UAP transparency efforts in Congress. https://t.co/dClJdh00Fc https://t.co/Kthbc5lSY3 https://t.co/Z2aT434lHu

[Retweeted] Corporate Corruption, UAP & Congressional Oversight Rep. Robert Garcia (@RepRobertGarcia), poised to become Chair of the House Oversight Committee, has identified corporate corruption as a major investigative priority in his new role. Garcia was originally one of the lawmakers who questioned David Grusch during the historic July 2023 UAP hearing, where Grusch raised serious allegations involving defense contractors, misuse of taxpayer funds through Independent Research and Develop...
[Retweeted] In this second clip from the recent Beyond Institute Stockholm UAP conference, Disclosure Foundation Executive Director Jordan Flowers (@jordanflowers) examines the geopolitical Risks of UAP Secrecy. Flowers: "There is a sub rosa arms race for winner-take-all technology... Maybe a breakthrough has rattled this perfect equilibrium of secrecy and that's why we need to take risks in terms of disclosing this to the public so that we can work together... to collaborate and solve the pr...
[Retweeted] UAP Disclosure: A Global Challenge During a recent UAP panel in Stockholm, Sweden, Jordan Flowers (@jordanflowers), Executive Director of the Disclosure Foundation, and Dylan Borland (@TheDylanBorland), former U.S. Air Force specialist and UAP whistleblower, discussed the international challenges surrounding UAP transparency. Their discussion highlighted the influence of the Five Eyes intelligence alliance, the lack of formal UAP reporting mechanisms across much of Europe, and the...
[Retweeted] @disclosureorg @LiberationTimes @ChrisUKSharp Worth remembering the 2023 UAP Disclosure Act lost its independent review board and eminent-domain sections in conference. If the lame-duck Congress revives it, those two pieces decide whether it can actually force anything out.
[Retweeted] "What's being released is not satisfactory to me.” — Ryan Graves In a new CBS Sunday Morning report, Graves raises concerns about the limited UAP evidence made public despite seven tranches of government records. The Disclosure Foundation welcomes these releases as meaningful progress toward greater transparency. However, significant gaps remain, including historical intelligence assessments, investigative findings, high-quality sensor data, and records held by government contract...

[Retweeted] President Trump and the outgoing Republican Congress retain the immediate power to pass the UAP Disclosure Act and authorize the release of classified information. Although Democrats plan to push for further transparency next year, Trump ultimately controls the executive branch's authority to reveal what the U.S. government knows about non-human intelligence. There's no reason to delay transparency any further. https://t.co/G2l9P19cJb







